Knowledge Center Fundamental Analysis
An organizational structure of a company is like a blueprint that shows how things get done in a company to reach its goals. It lays out who does what, what rules to follow, and who's in charge of what.
It also shows how information moves around within the company. In some setups, decisions come from the big bosses and filter down. In others, decision-making power is spread out among different levels.
Having a structure helps companies stay organized and keep their eyes on the prize.
Organizational structure of a company vary widely and serve different purposes in companies. Here's a brief explanation of organizational structure types:
Functional Structure:
The functional structure divides a company based on specialized functions such as marketing, sales, and operations. It's common among small-to-medium-sized businesses and helps streamline processes within each department.
Divisional or Multidivisional Structure:
Large companies with multiple business units often adopt this structure. Each division operates as its own entity, focusing on specific products, projects, or subsidiaries. For example, Johnson & Johnson organizes its business units independently, allowing for efficient management of diverse operations.
Team-Based Structure:
In team-based organizations, employees work in close-knit teams with leaders and workers collaborating to achieve specific goals. This structure promotes teamwork and flexibility in task allocation.
Flat (Flatarchy) Structure:
Commonly found in startups, the flat structure minimizes hierarchy and empowers employees with autonomy. Decision-making is decentralized, allowing for rapid implementation of ideas and innovation.
Matrix Structure:
Matrix structure assigns employees to multiple supervisors or departments, often causing confusion due to overlapping roles. However, it allows for efficient resource allocation across different projects or divisions.
Circular Structure:
Hierarchical yet circular, this structure places higher-level employees at the center, surrounded by concentric rings of lower-level staff. It encourages open communication and collaboration among different levels of the organization.
Network Structure:
This organizational structure of a company relies on external contractors and vendors to perform key functions. It features a small central headquarters coordinating with satellite offices and outsourced partners, enabling flexibility and scalability.
While often overlooked in many reports today, these characteristics play a significant role in determining the future success or failure of businesses.
Every industry or segment has specific factors that greatly influence its success and performance.
For example, in the retail sector, key metrics include falls and same-store sales (SSS).
Banking success is often measured by Net Interest Income (NII) and Net Interest Margin (NIM).
Telecom companies focus on negotiations around Average Revenue Per User (ARPU).
Hotels track average room tariffs and occupancy rates.
Currency levels are crucial for export-oriented IT firms and import-oriented oil companies.
Online businesses are heavily reliant on internet access and can significantly impact consumer shopping behavior.
Even slight changes in industry regulations or market dynamics can lead to significant shifts in forecasts.
For instance, a change in taxation rules for debt mutual funds in the General Budget of 2014 led to investors and distributors reconsidering their investment strategies.
Investing in a company without understanding these key drivers can lead to poor investment decisions.
Analysts must thoroughly assess and analyze these important industry drivers when evaluating a business.
The risks inherent in business operations are multifaceted and require careful consideration by both promoters and investors alike. Promoters often paint a rosy picture of the future, focusing on the potential success and profitability of their ventures. However, they may downplay or overlook the significant risks associated with turning their visions into reality. For example, while borrowing from the international market at low rates may seem appealing, the introduction of currency risk can dramatically alter the risk profile of the venture. This shift in perspective highlights the importance of considering all potential risks, including those that may not be immediately apparent.
Entrepreneurs, characterized by their willingness to take risks, possess a psychological resilience that enables them to navigate setbacks and failures. Historical examples, such as Rupert Murdoch's multiple failures before successfully establishing the Star Empire and Steve Jobs being ousted from Apple only to return and launch another successful venture, underscore the resilience and determination of entrepreneurs. However, while entrepreneurs may possess the fortitude to withstand risks, investors may not share the same risk tolerance.
Every business is inherently exposed to risks across various aspects, including operational, execution-related, and unforeseen external factors. These risks can range from market fluctuations to regulatory changes to internal operational challenges. It is imperative for analysts to thoroughly assess and analyze these risks across different dimensions of the business. By continuously questioning and evaluating potential pitfalls, analysts can gain a comprehensive understanding of the risk landscape and advise investors accordingly.
Promoters who dismiss or underestimate the risks associated with their ventures should be approached with caution. Their disregard for potential pitfalls may indicate a lack of awareness or a misguided sense of optimism. Analysts must remain vigilant and challenge assertions that suggest a lack of acknowledgment of potential risks. Ultimately, a prudent businessman acknowledges the inherent risks in the business and takes proactive measures to mitigate them. By adopting a risk-aware mindset and implementing appropriate risk management strategies, businesses can better navigate uncertainties and safeguard their long-term viability.
Adhering to regulations is vital for a company's credibility and long-term success. Compliance requirements include appointing a compliance officer, disclosing financial results, managing investor complaints, and providing information on shareholding patterns.
Companies that prioritize compliance demonstrate integrity and reliability. Analysts should consider a company's compliance history when assessing its trustworthiness. According to Warren Buffet, 'Honesty is a rare and valuable trait, not commonly found in everyone.
What are the different organizational structure types?
The primary organizational structures include functional, multi-divisional, flat, and matrix configurations. Additional types include circular, team-based, and network structures.
What is an organizational hierarchy chart?
An organizational hierarchy chart, also known as an organogram or org chart, visually illustrates the internal structure of a company. It showcases how teams and departments are organized, illustrates relationships across the organization, and delineates each individual's role and responsibilities within the company.
What is function organizational structure?
Organizational structure provides a clear visual representation of an organization's hierarchy and relationships between its parts. It serves as a communication tool to help people understand the organization's structure.
What are the 5 Traditional Forms of Organizational Structure?
The five traditional forms of organizational structure are functional reporting, divisional or product reporting, process-based, matrix, and flat structures. Each structure has its own advantages and disadvantages, so it's crucial to assess which one aligns best with your business requirements.
Why is it important to understand the organizational structure of an organization?
Understanding the organizational structure of an organization provides clarity on how tasks are organized, roles are defined, and information flows within the company, facilitating effective communication and decision-making processes.